On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:31:02PM -0600, Calvin Gordon wrote:
> hmmm. you are correct that the logs would become useless if there was a
> double nat.
>
> Steven Kurylo wrote:
> >>trying to block improper internet usage, on-line social networking on work
> >>hours, etc.
> >>
> >Technical solutions rarely fix social problems.
> >
> Agreed, but as the IT guy, i have to be able to show that i have
> implemented all advised solutions, and corporate procedures, else i'm
> not doing my job. We've become a branch office to a bigger company, and
> enjoy quite a bit of autonomy and want to keep it that way. While we
> were an independent company the "I'll hit you with my stick" policy
> worked well enough.
It's not possible, affordable or practical to implement all possible
solutions. The prudent approach is to identify the biggest problems
and spend money/time where it will get the biggest impact.
Adding another critical network component because one person is
adicted to crackbook doesn't make sense when a chat from management
should be sufficient.
As for DHCP, you can always continue to run it inside and use a DHCP
relay agent to handle hosts on other network segments.
Received on Wed May 28 16:39:56 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 28 2008 - 16:39:59 CST