Re: NakedDSL

So using this (if its available here in Cuba <-joke ) with a 3rd party
voip (ScottTel for instance) doesn't give any advantage as opposed to
broadband (shaw)?

Jim MacKenzie wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "robm" <rob.merritt@usask.ca>
> To: <linux@slg.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:47 AM
> Subject: NakedDSL
>
>
>> Hmmm what are the advantages of this technology , specifically
>> if you have a full blown VoIP implementation?
>
>
> Naked DSL is a DSL Internet connection without the accompanying
> landline. It's no different from normal DSL, except that some
> providers won't sell DSL without selling you POTS service. Those that
> do call it "naked" or "bare" or "dry" DSL.
>
> As to whether it's advantageous, it's only advantageous if it has a
> service or pricing advantage over cable Internet, which obviously has
> no requirement for accompanying POTS service.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> I'm interested in upgrading my 28.8 kilobaud internet connection to a
> 1.5 megabit fiberoptic T1 line. Will you be able to provide an IP
> router that's compatible with my token ring ethernet LAN configuration?
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message with the word "unsubscribe" (without the
> quotes) in the body to linux-request@slg.org
> Archives are at http://list.slg.org/