Re: Looking for RAM again :)

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:48:41PM -0600, Conrad Knauer wrote:
> >> "168-pin Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM) [...] PC-100
> >> (64-bit, non-ECC, 100MHz, 3.3volt)"
> >
> >Those are tough to come by. PC-133 are easy to find, but will likely
> >not work.
>
> Hmm... well, looks like I'm just looking for a single 64MB one now ^_-;

I wouldn't go that far. Uncached RAM is probably still faster than swapping
to disc, it's just not as fast as it could be if it was cached in the CPU.
Received on Thu May 10 17:56:02 2007