Re: Edgy upgrade breaks bits.

Les Klassen Hamm wrote:
> I thought the very notion of LTS was that it would be the stable, long
> term supported, safe for business and stability model, thus the very one
> that those who need the latest and greatest and newest and on the edge
> versions should avoid. If you want a stable, reliable, predictable linux
> for your business, go LTS. If you need the latest spongy windows and
> cubist desktop switching and the like, upgrade your ubuntu every 6
> months. Or do I misunderstand the intent of LTS?
> Les...

6.04's Kubuntu shipped with a 3.5.x, and the 3.5.6 was the latest in
their minor-version bugfix chain.

For it to be in Edgy and not Dapper seems counterintuitive to me. I
wouldn't expect KDE 4.0, but that's a different animal.
Received on Sun Mar 25 12:36:54 2007