Re: Upstart Questions Answered (hopefully to your satisfaction :)

Scott Walde wrote:
> The concept of Upstart operating as the "process launcher" with some
> sort of IPC between it and atd/crond or even inetd, makes sense. I
> would say that leaves it in the "do one thing well" camp.
Indeed, I'd be happy if this is the direction they take it.
> Could shells then also request upstart start a process for me, rather
> than forking it themselves?
That would certainly be a handy bit of functionality to have.

G
Received on Sun Jan 7 16:22:08 2007