On 1/3/07, robm <rob.merritt@usask.ca> wrote:
> Yep it was taking quite along time to do the dd , but maybe if I used
> the bs=x option I would have got better performance didn't think of that
> until you mentioned nop used as a pad.
If you search the archives I have a question about what bs would get
the best performance, doing the exact same thing - it was a few years
ago. With the default I think it took a couple hours. bs=1024k
brought it down to 15 minutes. I never tried tweaking much more than
that.
Received on Wed Jan 3 10:42:48 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 03 2007 - 10:42:56 CST