Re: mix and match memory

Eve Kotyk wrote:
> Thanks Graeme,
>
> Slow isn't great, but more is better, right? ;-)
Indeed. :)

I find that having more RAM is usually significantly more important than
having marginally faster RAM. IMO, this is mostly because Linux does a
decent job of caching disk I/O into RAM, and disk I/O is always a way
bigger bottleneck than an extra 33MHz of RAM speed, even with a smoking
hot RAID array. ;)

G
Received on Fri Dec 29 23:42:48 2006