On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:12:17AM -0600, Keith Snape wrote:
> As stated in the linked article earlier, the deadline for having the
> infrastructure and procedures in place is Sept 12th 2007 - so it's not
> terribly suprising to me that having Shaw request ported numbers now
> (nearly a year earlier than the deadline - not to say it can't be done
> sooner) is causing complications and delays.
>
> It does amuse me that Shaw's pointing fingers like that.
Kettle to pot: you're black!
We've heard first hand on this list from another competitive local carrier
that SaskTel appears to make it dificult/impossible for competitive carriers
to get Saskatchewan numbers, something SaskTel has been required to do for
a few years. Their resistance has to providing local numbers for competitve
carriers is not a technical difficulty, it's purely a business issue. Why
should we expect SaskTel to be less resistive to number portability?
Received on Fri Dec 8 10:24:26 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 08 2006 - 10:24:35 CST