redundant as in load balanced .... tape is fine for backup.
On 7/26/06, robm <rob.merritt@usask.ca> wrote:
> Redundant as in load balanced (fail over) ? or just redundant so you
> don't lose content (ie nightly rsync of file system)
>
>
> Dick Groot wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I need a little help. I am wandering outside my comfort zone here.
> > We are trying to set up a debian linux web server with a second
> > redundant server as backup.
> >
> > It is going to be a mysql database driven php web site. <not porn>
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > any advice would be greatly accepted.
> >
> > thanks
> > Dick
> >
>
>
> --
> "Well, there's SPAM, egg, sausage, and SPAM. That's not got MUCH SPAM in it."
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message with the word "unsubscribe" (without the
> quotes) in the body to linux-request@slg.org
> Archives are at http://list.slg.org/
>
Received on Wed Jul 26 09:22:58 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 08 2006 - 23:26:38 CST