Steven Kurylo wrote:
>> What I'd like to hear is what motivates this problem, because there
>> might be another solution that's simpler which we could suggest, but he
>> himself doesn't see.
>
> The problem is exactly what I've already stated. I have a symmetrical
> connection. For example, I can get 2Mb in either direction. So I
> could have two downloads at 1Mb each. Or two uploads at 1Mb each. Or
> one upload and one download at 1MBps each. It doesn't matter which
> direction, but my total throughput isn't going over 2Mb.
>
> So right now, for shaping to work properly, I have to do something
> like 1.5Mb for download and 0.5Mb for upload. The is really
> inefficient if I have a huge upload while the download is idle,
> because the upload will be capped at 0.5Mb.
>
> I had looked into a similar solution to Dave's suggestion for PF, but
> it doesn't look like its possible. So I'm going to take his advice
> and persue a solution with iproute2.
>
> Thanks.
>
For example if you have, say, a 2Mb modem --- which means that you have
2Mb in the updirection and, therefore at the same time, you have 2Mb in
the down direction (because you said that the modem is symmetrical).
There is NO way that you can make that same modem give you say 3Mb in
the updirection and 1Mb in the down direction. The hardware would never
allow it. Not BEEP nor TCP packet dropping or IP routing is going to
change that.
Later
William
Received on Sun Jul 23 21:16:23 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 08 2006 - 23:26:38 CST