Re: Proof (in my mind) that 2.6 is ready for production use.

[tony@blackfish ~]$ uname -a
Linux blackfish 2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 #1 Fri Jul 15 00:52:32 EDT 2005
i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
[tony@blackfish ~]$ uptime
15:02:04 up 191 days, 16:18, 7 users, load average: 0.43, 0.15, 0.05

On 2-May-06, at 2:44 PM, Dylan Griffiths wrote:

> # Uptime | System Boot up
> --------------------------
> +-------------------------------------------------
> -> 1 237 days, 13:54:56 | Linux 2.6.12.3 Wed Sep 7 01:04:56 2005
> 2 144 days, 10:57:46 | Linux 2.2.19 Thu Aug 30 14:30:08 2001
> 3 139 days, 10:11:50 | Linux 2.6.7 Mon Aug 23 04:01:20 2004
> 4 122 days, 00:12:09 | Linux 2.2.14 Sat Feb 26 02:08:19 2000
> 5 113 days, 08:23:35 | Linux 2.4.19 Fri Aug 8 02:00:01 2003
> 6 84 days, 05:21:24 | Linux 2.2.17 Tue Jan 23 21:19:34 2001
> 7 75 days, 21:27:38 | Linux 2.4.17 Mon Jan 28 05:18:57 2002
> 8 68 days, 02:23:17 | Linux 2.4.19 Sun Dec 8 01:52:08 2002
> 9 59 days, 02:23:11 | Linux 2.6.0-test11 Fri Dec 5 13:23:25
> 2003
> 10 58 days, 17:53:06 | Linux 2.4.18 Tue Jul 16 23:27:23 2002
> --------------------------
> +-------------------------------------------------
>
>
> I totally forgot about the machine, as it's been perfectly
> faultless since the start of the 2005-2006 regular session :)
>
> --
> "Well, there's SPAM, egg, sausage, and SPAM. That's not got MUCH
> SPAM in it."
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message with the word "unsubscribe" (without
> the
> quotes) in the body to linux-request@slg.org
> Archives are at http://list.slg.org/
Received on Tue May 2 15:06:40 2006